Recent Advances in Big Data


Recent Advances in Big Data is a peer-reviewed Journal. The Journal is focused towards the publication of current research work carried out under the field Big Data. This Journal covers all major fields of applications in Big Data. The prime focus of the Journal is to publish articles related to the current trends in Big Data research.

The Journal of Big Data publishes high-quality, scholarly research papers, methodologies and case studies covering a broad range of topics, from big data analytics to data-intensive computing and all applications of big data research. The Journal scrutinize the challenges facing big data today and going forward including, but not limited to: data capture and storage; search, sharing, and analytics; big data technologies; data visualization; architectures for massively parallel processing; data mining tools and techniques; machine learning algorithms for big data; cloud computing platforms; distributed file systems and databases; and scalable storage systems. Academic researchers and practitioners will find the Journal of Big Data to be a determining source of innovative material..


Dr. Amit Rathi 
Assistant Professor
Department of Computer Science
Jaypee University of Engineering & Technology, Distt.-Guna
Email: amitrathi10@gmail.com

Mr. ANIEDU, Azubuike N.
Senior Lecturer
Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka

Dr. Bhupesh Kumar Singh
Professor
Department of Computer Science
Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia

Mr. Abhishek S RAO
Assistant Professor
Department of Computer Science
NMAM Institute of Technology, Karnataka
Email: abhishekr25@gmail.com

Dr. Dharmendra T. Patel
Associate Professor
Department of Computer Science
Smt.Chandaben Mohanbhai Patel Institute of Computer Applications,Gujarat

Mr. Gaurav Agarwal
Assistant Professor
Department of Computer Science
Raj Kumar Goel Institute Of Technology
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
Email: gaurav13shaurya@gmail.com

Mr. Subhrajit Roychowdhury
Lead Research Engineer
Department of Computer Science
GE Research, Niskayuna, NY, USA
Email: subhrajit.rc@gmail.com

Dr. Ajay B. Gadicha
Assistant Professor
Department of Computer Science
P.R.Pote (Patil) College of Engg. & Mgmt , Amravati
Email: ajjugadicha@gmail.com

Dr. M. Archana
Assistant Professor
Department of Information and Technology
Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamilnadu
Email: archana.aucse@gmail.com

Prof. Harish Dadhich
Head of Department
Department of computer science & Engineering,
Vyas College of Engineering & Technology, Jodhpur
Email: dadhich_harish@rediffmail.com

Ms. ABIRAMI SIVAPRASAD
Assistant Professor
Department of Information Technology department
Shah and Anchor Kutchhi Engineering College, Mumbai

Mr. N.SIRANJEEVI
Assistant Professor
Department of Information Technology department
AVS College of Arts & Science , Tamilnadu
Email: siranjeevinp@gmail.com

Peer Review Policy

The peer review process for journal publication is essentially a quality control mechanism.

After an editor receives a manuscript, the first step is to check that the manuscript for quality, originality, validity and whether appropriate method has been followed. If it does, then the editor moves to the next step, which is peer review. Peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are usually not part of the editorial staff. The editor will send the manuscript to two or more reviewers. The peer reviewers will then prepare a report that assesses the manuscript, and return it to the editor.

After reading the peer reviewer's report, the editor will decide to do one of three things: reject the manuscript, accept the manuscript, or ask the authors to revise and resubmit the manuscript after responding to the peer reviewers’ feedback. If the authors resubmit the manuscript, editors will sometimes ask the same peer reviewers to look over the manuscript again to see if their concerns have been addressed. This is called re-review.

The final decision on the manuscript is taken by the editor. Only when there are any conflict issues, the editor-in-chief of the journal is involved.

Journal decision-making process

After a paper is submitted to a journal, the journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether rejected if it is found to be of insufficient quality, outside focus and scope of the Journal or if they are considered not original.

Editors-in-chief have full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content with no interference from journal owners. Editors should defend the confidentiality of authors and peer reviewers (names and reviewer comments).

Author will receive prompt acknowledgement of submission of articles. If acknowledgement is not received within two weeks, please contact the Administrative Office, preferably by e-mail.

AUTHOR GUIDELINES

The manuscript should be in English and prepared on the following lines:- Title: Title should be brief, specific and informative, the scientific name(s) in italics/underlined.

Authors: Names of authors to be typed, in capitals unaccompanied by their degrees, titles etc.

Address: Address of the institution where the work was carried out is given below the name(s) of author(s). Present address of correspondence should be given as footnote indicating by asterisk the mark (*), the author to whom the correspondence is to be addressed.

Abstract: The Abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory, briefly present the topic, state the scope of the experiments, indicate significant data, and point out major findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be in about 100 to 150 words. Standard nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should be avoided. No literature should be cited.

Key words: Following the abstract, key words not more than 8 (Eight ) that will provide indexing references should be listed and in alphabetical order.

Introduction: This should be brief and the review of the literature should be relevant to the theme of the paper. Extensive review and unnecessary detail of earlier work should be avoided.

Materials and Methods: It should describe an appropriate methodology etc. but if known methods have been adopted, only references are cited. It should comprise an experimental design and techniques with experimental area and institutional with year of experiment.

Results and Discussion: It should be combined to avoid repetition. The results should not be repeated in both tables and figures. The discussion should relate to the significance of the observations.

Conclusion and Acknowledgement: Table numbers should be followed by the title of the table, Line drawings/photographs should contain figure number and description thereof. The corresponding number(s) of Tables, Figures etc should quote in the text. Size of tables and figures should be below 1 MB.

References: Author(s) – Family name and initials. Title of article (Italics). Title of Journal (Abbreviated) , Publication year; Volume (Issue): Pages.

1. Srivastava N, Diwakar M, Ajnara J. Evaluation of Nanostructured Metal Ceramic Coatings for solar thermal Applications. IJNS. 2008; 336(7646): 701–4p. (Journal publication less than three Authors)

2. Hanna JN, McBride WJ, Brookes DL, et al. Hendra virus infection in a veterinarian. Med J Aust. 2006; 185(10): 562–4p. (Journal publication having more than three Authors)

3.. Srivastava N, Diwakar M. Evaluation of Nanostructured Metal Ceramic Coatings for solar thermal Applications. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2007;10(4):422–34p. doi:10.1014/j.psychsport.2007.03.007. (Electronic article – with DOI number)Page/Line.

Number: Authors are requested to mention Page number and Line number to each line in the MS for easy and quick review. Text Alignment, line spacing, word count, figures, tables etc. must be as per format.

Yet To Be Published